cursivewritingsheets.com Free printable cursive worksheet generator

Handwriting guide

Cursive Handwriting Styles Compared

A reference guide to cursive handwriting instruction, written for teachers, parents and adult learners. Free worksheets are linked throughout.

Live preview

Preview ready

Summary

The main cursive handwriting styles taught in English-speaking schools are Zaner-Bloser, D'Nealian, the Palmer Method, Handwriting Without Tears and the ornamental Spencerian script. They differ mainly in slant, letter shape and how print transitions into cursive: Zaner-Bloser teaches vertical print and a separate cursive alphabet, while D'Nealian teaches slanted print with exit tails so the same letterforms convert into cursive with minimal relearning.

Key facts

  • Zaner-Bloser (1895): vertical ball-and-stick print with a separate, traditional cursive alphabet learned later.
  • Palmer Method (c. 1894): plain, fast business hand taught with whole-arm movement; the ancestor of most modern classroom cursive.
  • D'Nealian (1978): slanted print with exit tails, designed by Donald Thurber to make the print-to-cursive transition nearly seamless.
  • Handwriting Without Tears (1977): simplified vertical letterforms on two-line rather than four-line paper; common in occupational therapy.
  • Spencerian (1840s): ornamental oval-based script with shaded strokes — calligraphy rather than a practical handwriting method.
  • All styles share the same underlying rules: baseline placement, midline x-height, uniform slant, and joins formed by exit stroke into entry stroke.

Last updated:

Handwriting Guide

Cursive Handwriting Styles Compared

Cursive is not a single alphabet. Several distinct instructional systems — sometimes called penmanship methods — have been taught in English-speaking schools, and they differ in letter shapes, slant, entry strokes and how print transitions into cursive. This guide compares the major styles and explains which one a learner is most likely to encounter.

In depth

Complete Guide

The main cursive handwriting styles

StyleIntroducedSlantDefining characteristic
Zaner-Bloser1895Vertical print, slanted cursiveSimple ball-and-stick print, with a separate traditional cursive alphabet learned later
Palmer Methodc. 1894Moderate forward slantPlain, fast, business hand taught with whole-arm movement
D'Nealian1978Consistent forward slantSlanted print with exit tails, designed so print converts to cursive with minimal relearning
Handwriting Without Tears1977VerticalSimplified vertical letterforms and a distinctive double-line paper rather than four-line ruling
Spencerianc. 1840sPronounced forward slantOrnamental oval-based script with shaded strokes; calligraphic rather than a classroom method

Zaner-Bloser

Zaner-Bloser is the most widely recognised traditional American handwriting programme. Its print alphabet uses vertical 'ball and stick' letterforms built from circles and straight lines, which are easy for young children to produce. Its cursive alphabet is separate and conventional, with looped ascenders and a clear forward slant. The trade-off is that print and cursive are effectively two different alphabets, so the transition requires genuine relearning.

D'Nealian

D'Nealian, developed by Donald Thurber and introduced in 1978, was designed specifically to solve that transition problem. Its print letters are already slanted and already end in a small exit tail, so converting a printed letter to a cursive one is largely a matter of joining the existing tail to the next letter. Critics note the slanted print is harder for very young children to form than vertical ball-and-stick shapes; supporters note the transition to cursive is far smoother.

Palmer Method

The Palmer Method, developed by Austin Palmer, stripped the ornamental flourishes out of nineteenth-century script to produce a plain, rapid business hand. It was taught with movement driven from the whole arm rather than the fingers, and dominated American classrooms for much of the first half of the twentieth century. It is rarely taught as a named programme today, but modern classroom cursive is essentially descended from it.

Handwriting Without Tears

Handwriting Without Tears uses simplified vertical letterforms and a distinctive two-line paper instead of the conventional four-line system, on the argument that fewer reference lines reduce cognitive load for beginners. It is widely used in occupational-therapy settings and with learners who have fine-motor difficulties.

Spencerian

Spencerian script is an ornamental style from the mid-nineteenth century, built on oval forms with deliberate thick-and-thin shading produced by pen pressure. It is beautiful but slow, and it is best understood as calligraphy rather than as a handwriting method for everyday writing. Learners looking for a practical hand should not start here.

International and regional cursive styles

The five systems above are the American classroom tradition. Cursive is taught differently elsewhere:

  • Getty-Dubay Italic: a simplified, slanted italic script developed by Barbara Getty and Inga Dubay, used in some US and international schools as an alternative to the loop-heavy Palmer-descended styles. Letters are narrower and less ornamented, with fewer loops on ascenders and descenders, and can be written joined or unjoined depending on the writer's speed.
  • British cursive / joined-up handwriting: UK primary schools generally teach continuous cursive from the start rather than print-then-cursive, under commercial schemes such as Nelson Handwriting or Letter-join. Letterforms are broadly similar to Palmer-descended cursive, but there is no single codified national standard the way there is with Zaner-Bloser or D'Nealian in the US.
  • Australian Modern Cursive / NSW Foundation Style: used across most Australian states, this style stays closer to print, with small curved entry and exit strokes rather than the full loops of Palmer-descended cursive — bridging print and cursive with minimal retraining, similar in spirit to D'Nealian.

None of these regional variants is more "correct" than the American systems above — the differences reflect different national curricula, not competing claims about the best way to form letters.

A short history of cursive handwriting styles

Spencerian, developed by Platt Rogers Spencer starting in the 1840s, was the dominant American hand through the Civil War era — an ornamental, oval-based script meant to be beautiful as much as functional. By the 1890s, business demand for faster writing pushed Austin Palmer to strip out Spencerian's shading and ornamentation, producing the plainer, quicker Palmer Method (c. 1894), which became the default American classroom hand for the next half-century. Zaner-Bloser followed in 1895 as a closely related system built around a similar plain, forward-slanted cursive, paired with its own vertical ball-and-stick print alphabet. Both came under sustained pressure through the twentieth century as classroom instruction time shrank, and in 1977-78 two very different responses arrived within a year of each other: Handwriting Without Tears simplified letterforms and page ruling for learners who struggled with fine motor control, while D'Nealian redesigned the print alphabet itself to make the eventual cursive transition smoother. Cursive instruction time then dropped sharply in many US states through the 2000s as curricula prioritised keyboarding, followed by a partial, mandate-driven revival from the mid-2010s onward — see why cursive is coming back for that more recent shift.

How many types of cursive are there?

There is no single official count. "Four types of cursive" is a common shorthand because most American classroom instruction descends from four named systems — Palmer, Zaner-Bloser, D'Nealian and Handwriting Without Tears — with Spencerian usually mentioned separately as the older, ornamental style those four all reacted against. Beyond these named, published programmes, most adult handwriting is really a personal variant shaped by whichever named system a given school happened to teach, so "how many styles" depends on whether the question means named published systems (a handful) or individual handwriting variation (effectively unlimited). This page covers the five named systems that account for nearly everything taught in English-speaking schools.

Zaner-Bloser vs Palmer Method

Both are traditional, non-ornamental classroom hands, and modern Zaner-Bloser cursive is a direct descendant of Palmer. The practical difference is in how the print stage is taught: Zaner-Bloser's print alphabet is upright "ball and stick," built from separate circles and lines, while Palmer was taught as a continuous, whole-arm movement from the start, print included. A learner taught with Zaner-Bloser's print alphabet experiences a bigger jump into cursive than one taught under Palmer's continuous-movement approach, since Zaner-Bloser's print and cursive are more distinct from each other.

D'Nealian vs Palmer Method

D'Nealian was designed specifically to fix the problem Zaner-Bloser has and Palmer does not: an abrupt jump from print to cursive. D'Nealian's print letters are already slanted with a small exit tail, so the cursive form is close to just joining those tails together — closer in spirit to Palmer's continuous-movement philosophy than to Zaner-Bloser's separated print and cursive alphabets, even though D'Nealian is the newer system (1978 vs Palmer's 1894).

Palmer vs Spencerian

Palmer exists specifically because Spencerian was considered too slow and too ornamental for ordinary business use. Spencerian's oval-based letterforms and pressure-shaded thick-and-thin strokes look elegant but take longer to produce and require a flexible-nib pen to shade properly; Palmer strips out the shading and ornamentation entirely, favouring plain, fast, uniform-width strokes suited to an ordinary pencil or ballpoint. A learner wanting practical, fast handwriting should learn Palmer-descended cursive; a learner wanting calligraphy should start with Spencerian and expect it to be a different skill, not a faster version of the same one.

Handwriting Without Tears vs Zaner-Bloser

The two sit at opposite ends of the simplicity spectrum. Zaner-Bloser keeps the traditional four-line ruling, a dashed midline, and conventional looped cursive letterforms; Handwriting Without Tears drops the midline entirely in favour of two-line paper and simplified letter shapes with fewer strokes per letter. Handwriting Without Tears is explicitly designed to reduce the number of decisions a beginner makes per letter, which is why it is common in occupational-therapy and special-education settings; Zaner-Bloser is the more traditional choice where a school wants cursive to look like conventional cursive from the start.

Handwriting Without Tears vs D'Nealian

Both were introduced within a year of each other (1977 and 1978) as responses to the same problem — beginners struggling with the print-to-cursive jump — but they solve it differently. D'Nealian redesigns the print alphabet to already resemble cursive, so the transition is a matter of joining letters that already lean and already carry exit tails. Handwriting Without Tears instead simplifies the letterforms and the page ruling themselves, reducing the number of strokes and reference lines a beginner has to track, and keeps print vertical rather than pre-slanting it. A child who struggles with fine motor control tends to do better with Handwriting Without Tears' fewer, simpler strokes; a child who is already print-fluent and just needs an easier bridge to cursive tends to do better with D'Nealian.

How to identify which style you're looking at

Given a sample of cursive handwriting or an old worksheet, a few letterforms give the style away faster than the whole alphabet:

  • The lowercase 'f': Spencerian's 'f' typically loops both above and below the baseline with visible pressure-shading; Palmer-descended styles (Zaner-Bloser, modern D'Nealian) use a single-loop 'f' with uniform stroke width throughout.
  • Overall slant: Spencerian leans more steeply forward than the roughly 10-15° convention used by Palmer, Zaner-Bloser and D'Nealian; Handwriting Without Tears is taught vertically, with no forward lean at all.
  • Stroke width: visible thick-and-thin shading within a single letter almost always signals Spencerian or another ornamental hand; a uniform stroke width throughout signals a modern classroom system.
  • The print alphabet, if visible: ball-and-stick circles and straight lines with no slant point to Zaner-Bloser; already-slanted print with small tails at the end of each letter points to D'Nealian.
  • The ruling on the page: two-line paper (no midline) is the Handwriting Without Tears convention; the traditional four-line system with a dashed midline is used by the others.
  • The capital 'Q': Palmer-descended styles typically write a capital 'Q' that resembles a numeral '2'; Spencerian's capital 'Q' is a more elaborate double-curve form closer to its ornamental lowercase letterforms.

How to choose a cursive style

The right style depends on who is learning and why, not on which system is objectively "best":

  • Child following a school curriculum: use whatever the school teaches, even if another style has merits — consistency between home and classroom worksheets matters more than the alphabet chosen.
  • Homeschooling with no curriculum constraint: D'Nealian or Handwriting Without Tears are the easiest starting points, since both were designed specifically to reduce the difficulty of the print-to-cursive jump that trips up most beginners.
  • Occupational therapy or fine-motor difficulties: Handwriting Without Tears is the most common recommendation, because its simplified letterforms and two-line ruling reduce the number of decisions and strokes per letter.
  • Adult relearning cursive: style matters far less than for a child — pick whichever letterforms look most like the cursive already half-remembered from school, since the goal is fluency, not learning an unfamiliar new alphabet.
  • Calligraphy or ornamental writing as a hobby: Spencerian, or a Spencerian-descended style, is the standard starting point, not any of the plain classroom hands above.

Which style should you learn?

For most learners the answer is: whichever style the school already teaches, because consistency between home and classroom matters more than the merits of any particular alphabet. If there is no school constraint, D'Nealian-style letterforms are the pragmatic default, because the print-to-cursive transition is the stage where most learners stall.

The worksheets on cursivewritingsheets.com use conventional modern cursive letterforms with looped ascenders and a consistent forward slant — compatible with Zaner-Bloser and D'Nealian cursive instruction, and adjustable for slant-neutral practice by changing line height and script mode. Start with beginner letter worksheets, or read the underlying cursive writing rules that all these styles share.

What every style has in common

Whichever alphabet is taught, the underlying rules do not change: letters rest on a baseline, x-height letters stop at the midline, slant is applied uniformly, and letters within a word join through the exit stroke of one letter into the entry stroke of the next. A learner who understands those four rules can adapt to any of the styles above.

Frequently asked questions

What are the four types of cursive?

There is no official list, but "four types of cursive" usually refers to Palmer, Zaner-Bloser, D'Nealian and Handwriting Without Tears — the four named systems behind most modern classroom cursive instruction. Spencerian is typically counted as a fifth, older, ornamental style rather than one of the four, since it predates and is stylistically distinct from all of them.

What is the difference between Zaner-Bloser and Palmer cursive?

Modern Zaner-Bloser cursive descends from Palmer, and the two look similar in the cursive alphabet itself. The real difference is earlier: Zaner-Bloser teaches an upright, ball-and-stick print alphabet first, making the jump to cursive bigger, while Palmer was taught as one continuous whole-arm movement from print onward, with a smaller jump into cursive.

Is D'Nealian the same as cursive?

No — D'Nealian is a print alphabet (slanted, with small exit tails) that is specifically designed to transition easily into a separate D'Nealian cursive alphabet. The print and cursive forms share the same slant and tails, which is what makes the changeover easier than in systems like Zaner-Bloser, where print and cursive look more different from each other.

Which cursive style is easiest to learn?

D'Nealian is generally considered easiest specifically for the print-to-cursive transition, since its print letters already carry the slant and exit tails cursive needs. For learning cursive on its own with no print-transition concern, the specific named style matters much less than consistent practice — see the site's full learning progression for what actually predicts success.

Is Spencerian the same as cursive?

Spencerian is a specific ornamental cursive style from the 1840s, not cursive in general. It is closer to calligraphy than to the plain, fast cursive taught in modern schools (Palmer, Zaner-Bloser, D'Nealian) — it uses pressure-shaded strokes and a flexible-nib pen, and takes considerably longer to produce than a modern classroom hand.

Can I mix cursive styles?

In practice, most adult handwriting already is a mix — few people write in a textbook-pure version of any one named system once they've been writing for years. For a learner still forming habits, though, sticking to one style's letterforms until they're automatic, then adapting from there, produces faster progress than switching between systems early.

What is Getty-Dubay Italic?

Getty-Dubay Italic is a simplified, slanted italic script developed by Barbara Getty and Inga Dubay, used in some US and international schools as an alternative to the loop-heavy Palmer-descended styles. Its letters are narrower and less ornamented, and can be written joined or unjoined depending on the writer's speed.

Is British cursive different from American cursive?

The letterforms are broadly similar to Palmer-descended American cursive, but UK schools typically teach continuous joined-up writing from the start rather than print-then-cursive, and there is no single national standard — schools choose from commercial schemes like Nelson Handwriting or Letter-join rather than following one codified system the way American schools follow Zaner-Bloser or D'Nealian.

Which cursive style do most schools use today?

There's no single national figure, but Zaner-Bloser and D'Nealian remain the two most commonly taught systems in US schools that still teach cursive, with Handwriting Without Tears widely used in early grades and occupational-therapy settings. State-level cursive mandates that have reappeared since the mid-2010s generally require that cursive be taught, not which named system to use, so the choice is usually made at the school or district level.

Related

Related Worksheets & Guides

About

About cursivewritingsheets.com

cursivewritingsheets.com provides fast, free access to customisable cursive handwriting worksheets. Generate practice sheets for prewriting strokes, letter formation, word tracing, and mixed review — all adjustable for paper size, line height, and script style. Written and maintained by Joe Scarffe. No sign-up required.